Evaluation

media type="custom" key="7289939" **Guidelines:** 1- to 3-page evaluation report **Due Date:** December 2

**Self & Peer Evaluations Guidelines:** Individually by each group member: Send the instructor self & peer evaluations in the body of an email message. Include a description of individual roles in the group in completing the project (e.g. how tasks were divided in the group, about how much time each individual spent doing them) and ratings of the contribution of EACH group member, including oneself, on a scale from 0 to 5 with 5 being the highest. Give a concrete summary of each member's contributions to the group along with numeric ratings.
 * Due Date: ** December 3

How will we assess our students? Should we develop a rubric or checklist?
 * Assessment:**


 * Evaluation:**

Post possible questions below that can be used for on the evaluation of the instruction:

Rate the overall quality of instruction, one being poor, 5 being excellent. (Jen) Rate the overall sequence of instruction, one being poor, 5 being excellent. (Jen) How beneficial was the instruction to you and your teaching? One being not at all, five being very beneficial. (Jen) How do you plan on contributing to the faculty wiki? (Jen) How comfortable do you feel after today's instruction on editing and adding to the CDS faculty wiki? Jen)
 * Session One:**

Tell two things that you learned today about wikis? (Cindy) Comment Which three pages on the wiki may be the most useful to you? (Cindy) List some of the pages in the wiki and put in an "other" What can be added to this wiki to make it work better for you and our school? (Cindy) Comment How do you rate your participation in this staff development? (Cindy)

If you are a teacher, will you be attending the optional wiki creation session? (Cindy) Rate the overall quality of instruction, one being poor, 5 being excellent. (Jen) Rate the overall sequence of instruction, one being poor, 5 being excellent. (Jen) Do you plan on integrating the use of the wiki tool in your own instruction? (Jen) What areas do you need more instruction in order to successful implement the wiki tool in the classroom? (Jen)
 * 1) I did not participate and am not interesting in learning about a wiki
 * 2) I came to the session and listened to the discussion
 * 3) I helped my group add to the wiki
 * 1) No. I don't see how they can benefit me or my teaching.
 * 2) No. I have a previous commitment,
 * 3) Maybe. I'm still thinking about it.
 * 4) Yes. If I can make it work in my schedule, I will come.
 * Session Two:**

Tell two things that you learned today about creating a wiki? Comment (Cindy) Do you feel comfortable to begin creating your own wiki? Comment (Cindy) What benefits do you see in using a wiki? Comment (Cindy)

Possible Session One Survey: media type="custom" key="7464305"

Some possible changes to the questions: 1. What did you find most useful about today's instruction? Least useful? 2. What was the most useful instructional tool used for the wiki instruction? handouts, demonstrations, jing videos, .... 3. What areas do you feel you need more instruction or assistance with?

Self Assessment:

I thought it would beneficial to have each faculty member complete a self assessment a few days after the instruction. This might tell us what the faculty needs as far as training and instructional tools. I am not sure about the questions or wording, but it is a place to start. There is two, one for the first session and one for the second. Look them over and let me know what you think. - Jen, 11/10

Updated on 11/15, 7:00pm

Survey One Results
Question #3: What instructional tool(s) did you enjoy the most or find the most useful? 7. Which three pages on the CDS faculty wiki may be the most useful to you?



Session Two Survey

media type="custom" key="7542527" []